I was thinking along the lines it was for all executables. i'll put them in the build folder then.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Only thing I would suggest is keeping .cmd/bin files in the build > folder. The bin folder is meant for the compiled artifacts. > > Otherwise, everything else sounds great. > > Thanks, > Troy > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Michael Herndon < > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > > > If you think it would be beneficial to have the scripts in the branch, I > > can > > do that. > > > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Would you add the same stuff to 2.9.4g branch too? > > > > > > DIGY > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Michael Herndon [mailto:mhern...@wickedsoftware.net] > > > Sent: Friday, April 29, 2011 10:28 PM > > > To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure > > > > > > I'm going to move ahead with this stuff this weekend unless anyone > > objects. > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Michael Herndon < > > > mhern...@wickedsoftware.net> wrote: > > > > > > > if you celebrate Easter, Happy Easter, if not, then Happy > > lucene.netclean > > > > up day. > > > > > > > > > > > > couple of questions. would it be cool if I can add a .gitignore to > the > > > root > > > > folder? > > > > > > > > also would it upset anyone if I add .cmd & .sh files to the /bin > > folder > > > > and .xml/.build files to the /build folder ? > > > > > > > > and sand castle and shfb to the /lib folder? > > > > > > > > - Michael > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Digy <digyd...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > >> Everything seems to be OK. > > > >> +1 for removing old directory structure. > > > >> > > > >> Thanks Troy > > > >> > > > >> DIGY > > > >> > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Troy Howard [mailto:thowar...@gmail.com] > > > >> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2011 3:07 AM > > > >> To: lucene-net-...@lucene.apache.org > > > >> Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] new structure > > > >> > > > >> I guess by 'today' I meant 'In about 6 days'. > > > >> > > > >> Anyhow, I completed the commit of the new directory structure.. I > did > > > not > > > >> delete the OLD directory structure, because they can live > > side-by-side. > > > >> Also, please note that I only created vs2010 solutions and upgraded > > the > > > >> projects to same. > > > >> > > > >> Please pull down the latest revision and validate these changes. If > > all > > > >> goes > > > >> well, I'll delete the old directory structure (everything under the > > 'C#' > > > >> directory). > > > >> > > > >> Thanks, > > > >> Troy > > > >> > > > >> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Troy Howard <thowar...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > Apologize. I got a bit derailed. Will be commiting today. > > > >> > On Apr 16, 2011 2:20 PM, "Prescott Nasser" <geobmx...@hotmail.com > > > > > >> wrote: > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > Hey Troy any status update on the new structure? I'm hesistant > to > > do > > > >> > updates since I know you're going to be modifying it all shortly > > > >> > > > > > >> > > ~P > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
