[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13027245#comment-13027245 ]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-445: ------------------------------------ If the DIH semantics cover all of the use cases, please follow that model: behavior, names, etc. It will be much easier on developers. > Update Handlers abort with bad documents > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-445 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-445 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: update > Affects Versions: 1.3 > Reporter: Will Johnson > Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Fix For: Next > > Attachments: SOLR-445-3_x.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, > SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445.patch, SOLR-445_3x.patch, solr-445.xml > > > Has anyone run into the problem of handling bad documents / failures mid > batch. Ie: > <add> > <doc> > <field name="id">1</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">2</field> > <field name="myDateField">I_AM_A_BAD_DATE</field> > </doc> > <doc> > <field name="id">3</field> > </doc> > </add> > Right now solr adds the first doc and then aborts. It would seem like it > should either fail the entire batch or log a message/return a code and then > continue on to add doc 3. Option 1 would seem to be much harder to > accomplish and possibly require more memory while Option 2 would require more > information to come back from the API. I'm about to dig into this but I > thought I'd ask to see if anyone had any suggestions, thoughts or comments. > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org