[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15595531#comment-15595531
 ] 

Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-8785:
------------------------------------

Perhaps it's not the right way, but currently it's the only way I know of.

In master, defaulting to persistence is probably an excellent option, 
especially if there is a reset option.  I just worry about causing problems for 
existing 6.x users.

So, combining everything into one coherent plan:

* Create a config option for 6.x to enable persistence, that defaults to false. 
 Set it to true in 6.x example configs.
* Add CoreAdmin and CollectionsAdmin actions to reset stats to 6.x and master..
* In master, the option to enable persistence will not exist.  Persistence will 
always be enabled. Users will be able to use the reset action.


> Use Metrics library for core metrics
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8785
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8785
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.1
>            Reporter: Jeff Wartes
>              Labels: patch, patch-available
>
> The Metrics library (https://dropwizard.github.io/metrics/3.1.0/) is a 
> well-known way to track metrics about applications. 
> In SOLR-1972, latency percentile tracking was added. The comment list is 
> long, so here’s my synopsis:
> 1. An attempt was made to use the Metrics library
> 2. That attempt failed due to a memory leak in Metrics v2.1.1
> 3. Large parts of Metrics were then copied wholesale into the 
> org.apache.solr.util.stats package space and that was used instead.
> Copy/pasting Metrics code into Solr may have been the correct solution at the 
> time, but I submit that it isn’t correct any more. 
> The leak in Metrics was fixed even before SOLR-1972 was released, and by 
> copy/pasting a subset of the functionality, we miss access to other important 
> things that the Metrics library provides, particularly the concept of a 
> Reporter. (https://dropwizard.github.io/metrics/3.1.0/manual/core/#reporters)
> Further, Metrics v3.0.2 is already packaged with Solr anyway, because it’s 
> used in two contrib modules. (map-reduce and morphines-core)
> I’m proposing that:
> 1. Metrics as bundled with Solr be upgraded to the current v3.1.2
> 2. Most of the org.apache.solr.util.stats package space be deleted outright, 
> or gutted and replaced with simple calls to Metrics. Due to the copy/paste 
> origin, the concepts should mostly map 1:1.
> I’d further recommend a usage pattern like:
> SharedMetricRegistries.getOrCreate(System.getProperty(“solr.metrics.registry”,
>  “solr-registry”))
> There are all kinds of areas in Solr that could benefit from metrics tracking 
> and reporting. This pattern allows diverse areas of code to track metrics 
> within a single, named registry. This well-known-name then becomes a handle 
> you can use to easily attach a Reporter and ship all of those metrics off-box.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to