[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15677694#comment-15677694
 ] 

Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-9778:
------------------------------------

bq. I suppose the ideal spot to record the luceneMatchVersion would be on the 
segment somehow, but I'm not sure that's possible and I don't think there's 
much value in that fidelity vs. the commit point metadata.

Segment merging, and the fact that query analysis happens before the index is 
ever examined, makes per-segment versions meaningless.

The plan sounds good to me, and you're right that the problems I described will 
be unaffected by whether we do it or not.  I was mostly curious about what 
would happen to the .txt file if those steps were taken.  Would it be updated 
to 6.6?

> Make luceneMatchVersion handling easy/automatic
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9778
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9778
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>
> I was thinking about luceneMatchVersion and how it's annoying to both explain 
> and get right, and maintain.  I think there's a way in Solr we can do this 
> way better:
> When an index is initialized, record the luceneMatchVersion in effect into a 
> file in the data directory, like luceneMatchVersion.txt.  It's a file that 
> will never be modified.
> The luceneMatchVersion in effect is the first of these that are specified:
> * {{<luceneMatchVersion>}} in solrconfig.xml
> * data/luceneMatchVersion.txt 
> * {{org.apache.lucene.util.Version.LATEST}}
> With this approach, we can eliminate putting {{<luceneMatchVersion>}} into 
> solrconfig.xml by default.  Most users will have no need to bother setting 
> it, even during an upgrade of either an existing index, or when they 
> re-index.  Of course there are cases where the user knows what they are doing 
> and insists on a different luceneMatchVersion, and they can specify that 
> still.
> Perhaps instead of a new file (data/luceneMatchVersion.txt), it might go into 
> core.properties.  I dunno.
> _(disclaimer: as I write this, I have no plans to work on this at the moment)_



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to