[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9764?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15685203#comment-15685203
 ] 

Michael Sun edited comment on SOLR-9764 at 11/22/16 5:03 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Here are some single user test results for the amount of memory saved.

Setup: Solr with a collection alias mapping to two collections, each with 4 
days of data. 
Test: Restart Solr, run query with filter for last 7 days and collect memory 
histogram on one server afterwards. The filter hits both collections, with one 
match all and the other match partially.
Result (extracted from  histogram)
|Patched|#BitDocSet instances|#MatchAllDocSet instances|bytes for [J|Mem Saving|
|Y|1|1|9998408496|3.4M|
|N|2|0|10001843704| |
|Y|2|2|10001833664|6.9M or 3.4M per hit|
|N|4|0|10008701640| |

Analysis:
The difference of bytes for long[] is 3435208 bytes(3.4M) if one MatchAllDocSet 
is hit.. That's the total amount of memory saved by this patch for one query 
per server per matched collection. The the other side, The core under study has 
27M documents. A BitDocSet would require a long[] at the size of 3.4M (27M/8) 
without patch, which is aligned with the memory saved.





was (Author: michael.sun):
Here are some single user test results for the amount of memory saved.

Setup: Solr with a collection alias mapping to two collections, each with 4 
days of data. 
Test: Restart Solr, run query with filter for last 7 days and collect memory 
histogram on one server afterwards. The filter hits both collections, with one 
match all and the other match partially.
Result (extracted from  histogram)
|Patched|#BitDocSet instances|#MatchAllDocSet instances|bytes for [J|Mem Saving|
|Y|1|1|9998408496|3.4M|
|N|2|0|10001843704| |
|Y|2|2|10001833664|6.9M or 3.4M per hit|
|N|4|0|10008701640| |

Analysis:
The difference of bytes for long[] is 3435208 bytes(3.4M) if one MatchAllDocSet 
is hit.. That's the total amount of memory saved by this patch for one query on 
one server. The the other side, The core under study has 27M documents, which 
requires a long[] at the size of 3.4M (27M/8), which is aligned with the memory 
saved from histogram.




> Design a memory efficient DocSet if a query returns all docs
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-9764
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9764
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Michael Sun
>         Attachments: SOLR-9764.patch, SOLR-9764.patch, SOLR-9764.patch, 
> SOLR-9764.patch, SOLR_9764_no_cloneMe.patch
>
>
> In some use cases, particularly use cases with time series data, using 
> collection alias and partitioning data into multiple small collections using 
> timestamp, a filter query can match all documents in a collection. Currently 
> BitDocSet is used which contains a large array of long integers with every 
> bits set to 1. After querying, the resulted DocSet saved in filter cache is 
> large and becomes one of the main memory consumers in these use cases.
> For example. suppose a Solr setup has 14 collections for data in last 14 
> days, each collection with one day of data. A filter query for last one week 
> data would result in at least six DocSet in filter cache which matches all 
> documents in six collections respectively.   
> This is to design a new DocSet that is memory efficient for such a use case.  
> The new DocSet removes the large array, reduces memory usage and GC pressure 
> without losing advantage of large filter cache.
> In particular, for use cases when using time series data, collection alias 
> and partition data into multiple small collections using timestamp, the gain 
> can be large.
> For further optimization, it may be helpful to design a DocSet with run 
> length encoding. Thanks [~mmokhtar] for suggestion. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to