[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15691118#comment-15691118
 ] 

Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-7521:
----------------------------------------

Just to be clear, I was only talking about the bit structures optimal-packed 
vs. word-aligned. Whether or not the performance/complexity trade-off is good 
enough for keeping the Direct*- and Packed*ThreeBlocks-implementations (which 
are both optimal-packed and word-aligned by nature) is harder to judge from the 
old performance tests: They differ a lot more across CPU architectures.

> Simplify PackedInts
> -------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7521
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7521
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7521.patch
>
>
> We have a lot of specialization in PackedInts about how to keep packed arrays 
> of longs in memory. However, most use-cases have slowly moved to DirectWriter 
> and DirectMonotonicWriter and most specializations we have are barely used 
> for performance-sensitive operations, so I'd like to clean this up a bit.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to