Thanks Ishan! I worked out a different approach with the minimal mutable schema stuff, we'll see if it makes sense.
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya <[email protected]> wrote: > The test doesn't have anything to do with faceting, though. Wasn't sure that > you were specifically looking for a faceting test with docValues=true, > indexed=false, or just a general one. > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 4:48 AM, Ishan Chattopadhyaya > <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Erick, >> As part of working on SOLR-5944, I wrote a few tests with docValues=true, >> indexed=false, stored=false. You can find it in the latest patch there. The >> schema file is called: schema-inplace-updates.xml, and one of the tests >> using that schema is: TestInPlaceUpdatesDistrib >> Regards, >> Ishan >> >> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Mikhail Khludnev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Sure. It make sense. Probably, no one added them yet, because if we facet >>> something, it's reasonably that we filter by this field then. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 2:12 AM, Erick Erickson <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Am I missing something or do our tests for DocValues=true, >>>> indexed=false tests... lack a little something for distributed mode? >>>> >>>> I'm trying to write a unit test for SOLR-5260 and piggy-backing on >>>> DistributedFacetExistsSmallTest. I'm having some problems there, which >>>> led me to start looking at other prior art and basically I can't find >>>> much. >>>> >>>> What I want: docValues=true, indexed=false in distributed mode. I >>>> found some schemas that have that, notably schema-docValues.xml but I >>>> don't find it (or some of the others) in the distributed tests. >>>> >>>> If we're pushing docValues for grouping, faceting and sorting and >>>> claiming that to accomplish that we don't need to have indexed=true we >>>> should, of course, have, you know, like, tests. >>>> >>>> So before I go and create a new test file for this configuration, I >>>> wanted to ask if I'm missing any prior art here. >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> Erick >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sincerely yours >>> Mikhail Khludnev >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
