[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13029435#comment-13029435
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2904:
--------------------------------------------

Earwin, that sounds great (changing current API instead of new IW method), I 
think?  Can you open a new issue?  Thanks.

> non-contiguous LogMergePolicy should be careful to not select merges already 
> running
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2904
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2904
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.2, 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2904.patch
>
>
> Now that LogMP can do non-contiguous merges, the fact that it disregards 
> which segments are already being merged is more problematic since it could 
> result in it returning conflicting merges and thus failing to run multiple 
> merges concurrently.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to