[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15810507#comment-15810507
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-9777:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit b0177312032e039673bfbbd42cd1dca09fb93833 in lucene-solr's branch
refs/heads/master from [~ichattopadhyaya]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=b017731 ]
SOLR-9777: IndexFingerprinting should use getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey()
instead of getCoreCacheKey() for per-segment caching
> IndexFingerprinting: use getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey() instead of
> getCoreCacheKey() for per-segment caching
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9777
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9777
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Assignee: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
> Attachments: SOLR-9777.patch
>
>
> [Note: Had initially posted to SOLR-9506, but now moved here]
> While working on SOLR-5944, I realized that the current per segment caching
> logic works fine for deleted documents (due to comparison of numDocs in a
> segment for the criterion of cache hit/miss). However, if a segment has
> docValues updates, the same logic is insufficient. It is my understanding
> that changing the key for caching from reader().getCoreCacheKey() to
> reader().getCombinedCoreAndDeletesKey() would work here, since the docValues
> updates are internally handled using deletion queue and hence the "combined"
> core and deletes key would work here. Attaching a patch for the same.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
