[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15823008#comment-15823008 ]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7624: -------------------------------------- bq. Should we take advantage of this move to require that all terms are in the same field? Using this query across multiple fields disables an optimization, and I don't think it is very useful etither? +1 I agree > Consider moving TermsQuery to core > ---------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-7624 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7624 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Improvement > Reporter: Alan Woodward > Assignee: Alan Woodward > Fix For: master (7.0), 6.4 > > Attachments: LUCENE-7624.patch > > > TermsQuery current sits in the queries module, but it's used in both > spatial-extras and in facets, and currently is the only reason that the > facets module has a dependency on queries. I think it's a generally useful > query, and would fit in perfectly well in core. > This would also allow us to explore rewriting BooleanQuery to TermsQuery to > avoid the max-clauses limit -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org