[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15843701#comment-15843701
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-10032:
------------------------------------
This report covers 876 tests. If any tests share the same name, the results for
one would currently be misses. Will have to start using full package names to
avoid that.
> Create report to assess Solr test quality at a commit point.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10032
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10032
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: Tests
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Assignee: Mark Miller
> Attachments: Lucene-Solr Master Test Beast Results
> 01-24-2017-9899cbd031dc3fc37a384b1f9e2b379e90a9a3a6 Level Medium- Running 30
> iterations, 12 at a time .pdf
>
>
> We have many Jenkins instances blasting tests, some official, some policeman,
> I and others have or had their own, and the email trail proves the power of
> the Jenkins cluster to find test fails.
> However, I still have a very hard time with some basic questions:
> what tests are flakey right now? which test fails actually affect devs most?
> did I break it? was that test already flakey? is that test still flakey? what
> are our worst tests right now? is that test getting better or worse?
> We really need a way to see exactly what tests are the problem, not because
> of OS or environmental issues, but more basic test quality issues. Which
> tests are flakey and how flakey are they at any point in time.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
