[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15865822#comment-15865822
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9530:
----------------------------------
Don't we already support partial updates? [~ichattopadhyaya] ? What is new in
this?
The configuration is not serving any real purpose. It is better to not accept
any initial configuration and just support request params. The URP is one of
the most complex configuration Solr has and most of the times they could be
just avoided
> Add an Atomic Update Processor
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9530
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9530
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
> Attachments: SOLR-9530.patch
>
>
> I'd like to explore the idea of adding a new update processor to help ingest
> partial updates.
> Example use-case - There are two datasets with a common id field. How can I
> merge both of them at index time?
> Proposed Solution:
> {code}
> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="atomic">
> <processor class="solr.processor.AtomicUpdateProcessorFactory">
> <str name="my_new_field">add</str>
> </processor>
> <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> </updateRequestProcessorChain>
> {code}
> So the first JSON dump could be ingested against
> {{http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/update/json}}
> And then the second JSON could be ingested against
> {{http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/update/json?processor=atomic}}
> The Atomic Update Processor could support all the atomic update operations
> currently supported.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
