[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10273?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15923512#comment-15923512
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-10273:
-------------------------------------
True; it's debatable... I nearly added a comment about being inclined to raise
this min length to something higher so I'm glad you brought it up. That Lucene
side value might change in the future or based on a user-chosen codec; we
needn't track it exactly. Also, just because the longest field is 1024 doesn't
mean the document overall is "small" because theoretically there could be a ton
of stored values instead of one particularly large one. Perhaps change to 4KB
default? Shrug.
> Re-order largest field values last in Lucene Document
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10273
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10273
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Fix For: 6.5
>
> Attachments: SOLR_10273_DocumentBuilder_move_longest_to_last.patch
>
>
> (part of umbrella issue SOLR-10117)
> In Solr's {{DocumentBuilder}}, at the very end, we should move the field
> value(s) associated with the largest field (assuming "stored") to be last.
> Lucene's default stored value codec can avoid reading and decompressing the
> last field value when it's not requested. (As of LUCENE-6898).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
