[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15928651#comment-15928651
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-10286:
--------------------------------------------------------

Commit 2502af9f3fa25a1b724400af61bf74102f2475dd in lucene-solr's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~dsmiley]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene-solr.git;h=2502af9 ]

SOLR-10286: large fields.
And refactored FieldType.checkSchemaField to call a new checkSupportsDocValues()


> Declare a field as "large", don't keep value in the document cache
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10286
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10286
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: David Smiley
>            Assignee: David Smiley
>         Attachments: SOLR-10286_large_fields.patch, 
> SOLR-10286_large_fields.patch
>
>
> (part of umbrella issue SOLR-10117)
> This adds a field to be declared as "large" in the schema.  In the 
> {{SolrIndexSearcher.doc(...)}} handling, these fields are lazily fetched from 
> Lucene.  Unlike {{LazyDocument.LazyField}}, it's not cached after first-use 
> unless the value is "small" < 512KB by default.  "large" can only be used 
> when its stored="true" and multiValued="false" and the field is otherwise 
> compatible (basically not a numeric field) -- you'll get a helpful exception 
> if it's unsupported. BinaryField is not yet supported at this time; it could 
> be in the future.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to