[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10304?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15934831#comment-15934831
]
Ishan Chattopadhyaya commented on SOLR-10304:
---------------------------------------------
+1 to the refactoring! The SolrIndexSearcher looks much cleaner now.
bq. Renamed static DocsStreamer.getDoc(doc) to convertLuceneDocToSolrDoc. I
considered moving it to SolrDocumentFetcher but it's not 100% clear it should.
Maybe?
There's also RTGC.toSolrDoc(), RTGC.toSolrInputDocument() that are very similar
to DocsStreamer.getDoc(). There maybe one or two more of these methods. I think
those should all be co-located in some utility class.
> Refactor Document/Stored-field handling out of SolrIndexSearcher
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10304
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10304
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Attachments: SOLR_10304_SolrDocumentFetcher.patch
>
>
> SolrIndexSearcher is nearly 3 thousand lines of code. A sizable part of it
> pertains to Document handling, including various stored-field concerns and
> docValue substitutions (docValueAsStored related). There are already
> comments marking the start and end of this part of SolrIndexSearcher, plus
> there some fields and their initialization that are only in support of those
> methods. I propose that all of this go to a new companion class
> {{SolrDocumentFetcher}}. SolrIndexSearcher can add a getter for it, and where
> applicable existing callers can call to this instead. "Override"'s will need
> to stay of course.
> ( Originally proposed in SOLR-10286 )
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
