[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-10400:
----------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-10400.patch
bq. ...we already have the NumericValueFieldType marker interface and children.
Actually, even better then using that marker interface we should just be using
FieldType.getNumberType which saves us the need for reflection calls --
particularly the repeated calls currently done in several "if else if else if
else" contexts where ultimately the code was trying to do a "switch" like
statement over the types of numerics -- and now (in the attached patch) using
FieldType.getNumberType: it can.
The attached patch fixes up the 3 places i found the "instanceof TrieFooField
|| instanceof FooPointsField" pattern...
* CollapsingQParserPlugin
* ExpandComponent
* DocumentExpressionDictionaryFactory
** this last one had an even simpler fix then using "getNumberType" --
ultimately it just wanted "getSortField()"
As things stand, there are a few nocommits in the patch because I'm concerned
about some edge cases that were ignored in the "instanceof" code that should
probably throw errors.
A bigger concern I have however is that i don't think there is enough test
coverage of these code paths (particularly using points fields) for me to feel
comfortable committing these changes until i have a chance to write some more
tests. (I don't *think* they break anything not currently broken, but i'd like
to be more confident that the current code isn't broken before i refactor it)
> refactor "instanceof TrieFooField || instanceof FooPointsField" to use
> "FooValueFieldType" marker interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10400
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10400
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Attachments: SOLR-10400.patch
>
>
> See previous comment from smiley in SOLR-9994...
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9994?focusedCommentId=15875390&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875390
> ...we already have the NumericValueFieldType marker interface and children.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]