[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038063#comment-13038063
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-415:
--------------------------------
Hi Ben,
Thanks for your comments & test code.
{code}
sfs = new SimpleFacetedSearch(reader, "category");
sfs.Search(query) // + fetch
{code}
is roughly equal to
{code}
foreach(cat in GetGroups("category"))
{
BooleanQuery bq = BooleanQuery();
bg.Add(query , Lucene.Net.Search.BooleanClause.Occur.MUST)
bg.Add(queryParser.Parse("category:" + cat) ,
Lucene.Net.Search.BooleanClause.Occur.MUST);
indexSearcher.Search(bg); // + fetch
}
{code}
It would be good to compare these two codes too.
DIGY
> Contrib/Faceted Search
> ----------------------
>
> Key: LUCENENET-415
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-415
> Project: Lucene.Net
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: Lucene.Net 2.9.4
> Reporter: Digy
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: PerformanceTest.cs, PerformanceTest.cs,
> SimpleFacetedSearch.cs, SimpleFacetedSearch.cs, SimpleFacetedSearch.cs,
> TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs, TestSimpleFacetedSearch.cs, facet performance.xls
>
>
> Since I see a lot of questions about faceted search in these days, I plan to
> add a Faceted-Search project to contrib.
> DIGY
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
