[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13038205#comment-13038205
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2995:
-------------------------------------
{quote}Or rather than revert... just iterate it forward until it satisfies
everybody's concerns. Why keep moving backwards?{quote}
+1. Reverting itself should not feel wrong - asking others to revert should
IMO. The default mode should be moving forward, not backward. Everything is
open to change and improvement - asking for a revert from someone else will
always be considered a very big deal by me. Unless it's a special circumstance
I'm going to rant and rave about it every time myself.
> factor out a shared spellchecking module
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2995
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2995-diff.patch, LUCENE-2995.patch,
> LUCENE-2995.patch
>
>
> In lucene's contrib we have spellchecking support (index-based spellchecker,
> directspellchecker, etc).
> we also have some things like pluggable comparators.
> In solr we have auto-suggest support (with two implementations it looks
> like), some good utilities like HighFrequencyDictionary, etc.
> I think spellchecking is really important... google has upped the ante to
> what users expect.
> So I propose we combine all this stuff into a shared modules/spellchecker,
> which will make it easier
> to refactor and improve the quality.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
