[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10303?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15966373#comment-15966373
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on SOLR-10303:
---------------------------------------
Github user dennisgove commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/171#discussion_r111227848
--- Diff: solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/StreamHandler.java ---
@@ -191,7 +237,20 @@ public void inform(SolrCore core) {
.withFunctionName("lteq", LessThanEqualToEvaluator.class)
.withFunctionName("not", NotEvaluator.class)
.withFunctionName("or", OrEvaluator.class)
-
+
+ // Date Time Evaluators
+ .withFunctionName(TemporalEvaluatorYear.FUNCTION_NAME,
TemporalEvaluatorYear.class)
--- End diff --
I'd like to approach this in a separate ticket. Would it be alright if we
change the use of TemporalEvaluatorYear.FUNCTION_NAME to "year" in the call to
`withFunctionName` for now?
> Add date/time Stream Evaluators
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10303
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10303
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Joel Bernstein
> Assignee: Joel Bernstein
>
> This ticket will add Stream Evaluators that extract date/time values from a
> Solr date field. The following Evaluators will be supported:
> hour (date)
> minute (date)
> month (date)
> monthname(date)
> quarter(date)
> second (date)
> year(date)
> Syntax:
> {code}
> select(id,
> year(recdate) as year,
> month(recdate) as month,
> day(recdate) as day,
> search(logs, q="blah", fl="id, recdate", sort="recdate asc",
> qt="/export"))
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
