That’s bizarre.

The smoke tester runs ‘ant validate’, which does *not* include 
"documentation-lint” (which includes "-ecj-javadoc-lint”, where unused imports 
are looked for).

By contrast, ‘ant precommit’ runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and 
“documentation-lint”.

Jenkins caught this not because of the smoke tester, but rather because the 
“nightly-smoke” task it uses runs “-jenkins-base”, which, like “precommit”, 
runs “check-working-copy”, “validate”, and “documentation-lint” (among others).

I think we should change the smoke tester to look at the same things as 
precommit, 

--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com

> On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:29 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Smoke testes passed as well
> 
> 
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> 
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> I guess precommit is only run as part of the smoke tester.
> 
> > On Apr 20, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Interesting the entire release process completed without complaining.
> >
> > Joel Bernstein
> > http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 9:10 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > The unused import was the only problem; I’ve removed it on branch_6_5.
> >
> > Sorry, hope I didn’t cause a delay in the release process.
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> > www.lucidworks.com
> >
> > > On Apr 20, 2017, at 8:57 AM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Crap, Jenkins found an unused import in my commit on branch_6_5 :(.  I 
> > > forgot to run precommit.  Doing so now.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Steve
> > > www.lucidworks.com
> > >
> > >> On Apr 19, 2017, at 8:07 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Done.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Steve
> > >> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>
> > >>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:49 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Woohoo!  Thanks Joel.  Running all tests on branch_6_5 now.
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Steve
> > >>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>
> > >>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 7:20 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I'm OK with restarting RC2. Let me know when you finish the back port.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>> Joel,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I know you’re in-process with RC2, but if you have to restart for some 
> > >>>> reason, I’d like to include SOLR-10527.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Steve
> > >>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I also had to change the smoke tester because of the SSL issue. Which 
> > >>>>> in theory means everyone else will have to as well. I'm pushing out 
> > >>>>> my changes to branch_6_5, so people can just update their branch 
> > >>>>> before running the smoke tester.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> Ok, I had to push out three changes to the branch but I seemed to 
> > >>>>> have moved passed this issue.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:50 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> I'll push out the changes and then revert. Hopefully the changes will 
> > >>>>> do the trick after they've been pushed.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>> Yeah, that is a sucky part of this: you want to make modifications on 
> > >>>>> the release branch, but you can’t test unless you commit (and push).
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Another alternative: make modifications in another checkout, then 
> > >>>>> invoke the script with from an unmodified source tree.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> e.g.:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> cd ..
> > >>>>> cp -r lucene-solr lucene-solr-2 # assuming lucene-solr is your 
> > >>>>> checkout dir
> > >>>>> # edit lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py
> > >>>>> cd lucene-solr
> > >>>>> python3 -u ../lucene-solr-2/dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py …
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> (a shorter form of that is to make a copy the script alone and invoke 
> > >>>>> the modified version from your checkout)
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Steve
> > >>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 4:32 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Ha, that doesn't work either. Now I get this error:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> RuntimeError: There are unpushed commits - "git log 
> > >>>>>> origin/branch_6_5.." output is:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So, I'm going to have to push this out.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Let's first decide if this makes sense as the way forward.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:28 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Steve, when I change the script to turn off verification I get the 
> > >>>>>> following error:
> > >>>>>> RuntimeError: git clone is dirty:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> So as part of the work around I think I'm going to have to commit 
> > >>>>>> locally and then revert locally. Does that make sense to you as the 
> > >>>>>> way forward?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch 
> > >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>> Could it be anything to do with the fact that the signer is Semantic
> > >>>>>> and they are being actively distrusted by - at least - Google:
> > >>>>>> http://www.securityweek.com/google-stops-trusting-symantec-issued-certificates
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>> Alex.
> > >>>>>> ----
> > >>>>>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and 
> > >>>>>> experienced
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 19 April 2017 at 16:22, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Ok, I'll turn off the cert verification. I wasn't sure if cert 
> > >>>>>>> verification
> > >>>>>>> was something that was integral to the process.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Steve Rowe <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Hi Joel,
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Not sure why this is suddenly an issue - I guess “SNI”
> > >>>>>>>> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication> has been 
> > >>>>>>>> enabled on
> > >>>>>>>> archive.apache.org?
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Some useful info here (about a “requests” lib, AFAICT an 
> > >>>>>>>> alternative to
> > >>>>>>>> urllib):
> > >>>>>>>> <http://docs.python-requests.org/en/master/community/faq/#what-are-hostname-doesn-t-match-errors>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Short term, you could turn off certificate verification.  The 
> > >>>>>>>> bottom
> > >>>>>>>> answer here uses the same lib as the script (urllib instead of 
> > >>>>>>>> urllib2,
> > >>>>>>>> which is assumed in the other answers on the page), to turn off 
> > >>>>>>>> certificate
> > >>>>>>>> verification:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/19268548/python-ignore-certicate-validation-urllib2>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>> Steve
> > >>>>>>>> www.lucidworks.com
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Apr 19, 2017, at 3:43 PM, Joel Bernstein <[email protected]> 
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> It appears that it's failing on verifying the SSL cert for
> > >>>>>>>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/lucene/java/.
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Joel Bernstein 
> > >>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>> I started working on 6.5.1 RC2. I ran the following:
> > >>>>>>>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py --push-local
> > >>>>>>>>> /tmp/releases/6.5.1 --rc-num 2 --sign EE64CB1E
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> I believe this is same basic command I used for RC1. But this 
> > >>>>>>>>> time I got
> > >>>>>>>>> a new error. At first I thought it might be incorrect keystore 
> > >>>>>>>>> password but
> > >>>>>>>>> I changed it and it is correct. Any thoughts what the issue is?
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Traceback (most recent call last):
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 313, in 
> > >>>>>>>>> <module>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  main()
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 294, in main
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  rev = prepare(c.root, c.version, c.key_id, c.key_password)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 98, in 
> > >>>>>>>>> prepare
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  checkDOAPfiles(version)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 143, in
> > >>>>>>>>> checkDOAPfiles
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  distpage = load(url)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File "dev-tools/scripts/buildAndPushRelease.py", line 67, in load
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  content = 
> > >>>>>>>>> urllib.request.urlopen(urlString).read().decode('utf-8')
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>> line 223, in urlopen
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  return opener.open(url, data, timeout)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>> line 526, in open
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  response = self._open(req, data)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>> line 544, in _open
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  '_open', req)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>> line 504, in _call_chain
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  result = func(*args)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>> line 1361, in https_open
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  context=self._context, check_hostname=self._check_hostname)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> File
> > >>>>>>>>> "/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.6/lib/python3.6/urllib/request.py",
> > >>>>>>>>> line 1320, in do_open
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>  raise URLError(err)
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> urllib.error.URLError: <urlopen error [SSL: 
> > >>>>>>>>> CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED]
> > >>>>>>>>> certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:749)>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Joel Bernstein
> > >>>>>>>>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to