[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10521?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15983281#comment-15983281
]
Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-10521:
-----------------------------------------
No feedback. It's ok. What about vetoes?
> sort by string field of the nested child when searching with {!parent}
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10521
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10521
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Attachments: SOLR-10521.patch, SOLR-10521.patch, SOLR-10521-raw.patch
>
>
> The idea is to integrate Lucene's {{ToParentBlockJoinSortField}}
> The approach to hookup it is a little bit tricky:
> {{sort=\{!childfield bjq=$q field=COLOR_s}desc}}
> the question no.1 wdyt about the syntax?
> internally it creates a function query with valueSource which produces
> {{ToParentBlockJoinSortField}}
> The main challenge is picking Solr field type from
> {{ToParentBlockJoinSortField}}, because as-is it's broken on {{mergeIds}} -
> ByteRefs need to be properly marshared and unmarshalled by a field type from
> child scope.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
