[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15990270#comment-15990270
]
Shawn Heisey commented on SOLR-10573:
-------------------------------------
For reasons that I covered in my reply to your solr-user message, I think ZK
should remain in a separate process.
I am all for creating a system where the user never has to know anything about
zookeeper configuration to get a fault-tolerant cloud up and running. I agree
with Yonik's message on the list where he talks about the difference between
internal complexity and difficulty for the user.
My most recent comment on SOLR-9635 discusses an idea related to this that will
require substantial work to realize, but would create a very easy user
experience.
> Hide ZooKeeper
> --------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10573
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10573
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Otis Gospodnetic
>
> It may make sense to either embed ZK in Solr and allow running Solr instances
> with just ZK and no data or something else that hides ZK from Solr users...
> Based on what the Solr poll that revealed lowish SolrCloud adoption and
> comments in
> http://search-lucene.com/m/Solr/eHNlm8wPIKJ3v51?subj=Poll+Master+Slave+or+SolrCloud
> that showed that people still find SolrCloud complex, at least partly
> because of the external ZK recommendation.
> See also:
> http://search-lucene.com/m/Lucene/l6pAi11rBma0gNoI1?subj=SolrCloud+master+mode+planned+
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
