[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15997517#comment-15997517
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-9530:
----------------------------------
[~sarkaramr...@gmail.com] going through the patch. I like the clever
multithreaded test
> Add an Atomic Update Processor
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-9530
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9530
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Varun Thacker
> Attachments: assertU(...)-works.png, commit()-doesn't-work.png,
> SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch,
> SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch,
> SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch, SOLR-9530.patch
>
>
> I'd like to explore the idea of adding a new update processor to help ingest
> partial updates.
> Example use-case - There are two datasets with a common id field. How can I
> merge both of them at index time?
> Proposed Solution:
> {code}
> <updateRequestProcessorChain name="atomic">
> <processor class="solr.processor.AtomicUpdateProcessorFactory">
> <str name="my_new_field">add</str>
> </processor>
> <processor class="solr.LogUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> <processor class="solr.RunUpdateProcessorFactory" />
> </updateRequestProcessorChain>
> {code}
> So the first JSON dump could be ingested against
> {{http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/update/json}}
> And then the second JSON could be ingested against
> {{http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/update/json?processor=atomic}}
> The Atomic Update Processor could support all the atomic update operations
> currently supported.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
