Hi Erick, This change is part of replica types. I mentioned this in SOLR-10233, but you are right, I should have mentioned probably in the dev list to get to more people. The last character represents the type of replica (n->NRT, t->TLOG, p->PULL). This is certainly not required and can be reverted back if people has concerns. I found it very useful when developing and I think it will also be helpful in prod, since the replica name is present in most log entries (since the MDC logging changes).
Tomás > On May 30, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I noticed recently that our replica names are changing (master only?) > to collection_shard1_replica_n1. Why? > > Mostly I wan to be sure we consider whether this change is worth the > confusion before it gets out into the wild. If it's just an aesthetic > change I question whether it's worth the confusion it'll generate. If > it serves a real purpose, that's another story.. > > Erick > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
