[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16049377#comment-16049377
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-10177:
---------------------------------
I actually think we can eliminate the randomized {{<field ... type="$variable"
... />}} usage completely and focus solely on randomzing the {{<fieldType ...
class="$variable" ... />}} approach (which would also simplify/reduce the
number of fieldTypes we need to add to all schemas) ... see SOLR-10864 for
details.
Assuming SOLR-10864 / SOLR-10807 moves forward, i'll fold SOLR-10177 into those
and remove the existing "type name" randomization.
> Consolidate randomized usage of PointFields in schemas
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-10177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10177
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Test
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>
> schema-inplace-updates.xml use per fieldType point fields randomization,
> whereas other some schemas use per-field. However, the variable name is
> similar and should be revisited and standardized across our tests.
> Discussions here
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5944?focusedCommentId=15875108&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15875108.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
