[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16054262#comment-16054262
]
David Smiley commented on LUCENE-7863:
--------------------------------------
Instead of hacking the index/codec, have you thought of using another field
that only has the reversed terms?
> Don't repeat postings and positions on ReverseWF, EdgeNGram, etc
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-7863
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7863
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
> Attachments: LUCENE-7863.hazard
>
>
> h2. Context
> \*suffix and \*infix\* searches on large indexes.
> h2. Problem
> Obviously applying {{ReversedWildcardFilter}} doubles an index size, and I'm
> shuddering to think about EdgeNGrams...
> h2. Proposal
> _DRY_
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
