Thanks Anshum, I'll have a look today. Le ven. 30 juin 2017 à 20:23, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> a écrit :
> Hi Uwe/Adrien, > > I reverted a bunch of changes to only get rid of the 5x format codec names > and it brings me to these errors: > > [javac] > /Users/anshum/workspace/anshumg/lucene-solr/lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene60/Lucene60Codec.java:35: > error: cannot find symbol > [javac] import > org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.Lucene50SegmentInfoFormat; > [javac] ^ > [javac] symbol: class Lucene50SegmentInfoFormat > [javac] location: package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50 > [javac] > /Users/anshum/workspace/anshumg/lucene-solr/lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene60/Lucene60Codec.java:39: > error: package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53 does not exist > [javac] import org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.Lucene53NormsFormat; > [javac] ^ > [javac] > /Users/anshum/workspace/anshumg/lucene-solr/lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene62/Lucene62Codec.java:38: > error: package org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53 does not exist > [javac] import org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.Lucene53NormsFormat; > [javac] ^ > [javac] > /Users/anshum/workspace/anshumg/lucene-solr/lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene60/Lucene60Codec.java:59: > error: cannot find symbol > [javac] private final SegmentInfoFormat segmentInfosFormat = new > Lucene50SegmentInfoFormat(); > [javac] ^ > [javac] symbol: class Lucene50SegmentInfoFormat > [javac] location: class Lucene60Codec > [javac] > /Users/anshum/workspace/anshumg/lucene-solr/lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene60/Lucene60Codec.java:171: > error: cannot find symbol > [javac] private final NormsFormat normsFormat = new > Lucene53NormsFormat(); > [javac] ^ > [javac] symbol: class Lucene53NormsFormat > [javac] location: class Lucene60Codec > [javac] > /Users/anshum/workspace/anshumg/lucene-solr/lucene/backward-codecs/src/java/org/apache/lucene/codecs/lucene62/Lucene62Codec.java:170: > error: cannot find symbol > [javac] private final NormsFormat normsFormat = new > Lucene53NormsFormat(); > [javac] ^ > [javac] symbol: class Lucene53NormsFormat > [javac] location: class Lucene62Codec > [javac] 6 errors > > As you mentioned, the old codecs are still used, but I thought we wouldn’t > need the 5x named formats. Should we just keep all of this? > > I also recreated my fork and applied the patch from the older fork, > instead of running the upgrade script, only so that I didn’t have to run > the upgrade script. The upgrade script doesn’t work on anything but the > master branch for a major version bump. > > All my changes are now here: > https://github.com/anshumg/lucene-solr/tree/upgrade-master-to-8 > > > -Anshum > > > > On Jun 29, 2017, at 4:18 PM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote: > > The problem is that old 7.x indexes still use some codecs named by version > 6. They were never updated! > > So backwards codec must keep all stuff in metainf and as classes that the > 7.0 original index format requires. Maybe create a dummy 7.0 index in > branch-7x to have a list of codecs to test. > > Uwe > > Am 30. Juni 2017 00:43:06 MESZ schrieb Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com>: >> >> I’ve pushed more changes there, and we have a new set of errors. This is >> one of them: >> >> [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test >> -Dtestcase=TestBackwardsCompatibility >> -Dtests.method=testUnsupportedOldIndexes -Dtests.seed=8FDA7D3598A2FB46 >> -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=ar-LB >> -Dtests.timezone=America/Indiana/Marengo -Dtests.asserts=true >> -Dtests.file.encoding=UTF-8 >> [junit4] ERROR 3.07s | >> TestBackwardsCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes <<< >> [junit4] > Throwable #1: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could >> not load codec 'Lucene60'. Did you forget to add >> lucene-backward-codecs.jar? >> [junit4] > at >> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([8FDA7D3598A2FB46:74214F1628395C1A]:0) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCodec(SegmentInfos.java:433) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCommit(SegmentInfos.java:360) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCommit(SegmentInfos.java:295) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:59) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader$1.doBody(StandardDirectoryReader.java:56) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:694) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.StandardDirectoryReader.open(StandardDirectoryReader.java:79) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.DirectoryReader.open(DirectoryReader.java:63) >> [junit4] > at >> org.apache.lucene.index.TestBackwardsCompatibility.testUnsupportedOldIndexes(TestBackwardsCompatibility.java:613) >> [junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >> [junit4] > Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: An SPI >> class of type org.apache.lucene.codecs.Codec with name 'Lucene60' does not >> exist. You need to add the corresponding JAR file supporting this SPI to >> your classpath. The current classpath supports the following names: >> [Asserting, CheapBastard, FastCompressingStoredFields, >> FastDecompressionCompressingStoredFields, >> HighCompressionCompressingStoredFields, DummyCompressingStoredFields, >> SimpleText, Lucene70] >> >> >> Do you intend to Ignore this for now? Also, in the last commit, I’ve >> Ignored a bunch of tests that use the old indexes. >> >> >> -Anshum >> >> >> >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 3:10 PM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> I did remove the declaration in META-INT/services, atleast everything >> that had a version in it’s name i.e. 5x, or 6x. >> >> I’ve also renamed the indexes for 6x, but here are a few that I wasn’t >> sure about what to do with these: >> sorted.6.3.0.zip >> sorted.6.2.1.zip >> sorted.6.2.0.zip >> moreterms.6.0.0.zip >> maxposindex.zip >> manypointsindex.zip >> empty.6.0.0.zip >> dvupdates.6.0.0.zip >> >> Considering you suggested disabling the tests, should we be removing >> these indexes and regenerating these post release when re re-enable tests >> or should we keep them here and just disable the tests? >> >> I’ve reverted the changes in SegmentInfos.java, and also changed >> testIllegalCreatedVersion as per your suggestion. >> >> I’m running the tests now, and will commit to my fork right after. >> >> Thanks for helping out with this. >> >> -Anshum >> >> >> >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 2:33 PM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Removing most backward codecs sounds good to me since the only codec that >> 8.0 needs to be able to read so far is the 7.0 codec which is in core. It >> looks like you removed the code, but you also need to remove their >> declaration in META-INF/services or the SPI loaded will try to load them >> and fail since it cannot find the class. >> >> Backcompat indexes will be added as we perform 7.x releases. However >> you'd need to rename the 6.x indices from index.6.x.x to unsupported.6.x.x. >> >> We have some specific tests like "moreterms" and "dvupdates". I think we >> need to disable them for now and make sure to reenable them once 7.0 is >> released. >> >> I think the changes you did in SegmentInfos.java >> <https://github.com/anshumg/lucene-solr/commit/c7f5b9f9fa94fe1a6e6abc7ffc74fc3df16293a4#diff-e3ccf9ee90355b10f2dd22ce2da6c73c> >> are >> not necessary. It looks like the version numbers are related to the current >> major, but it is actually due to the fact that 7.0 is the first version to >> record the version that was used at creation time. I think you can revert >> changes in this file entirely. In the testIllegalCreatedVersion test, >> I'd just replace 8 with 9 or Version.CURRENT.major + 1. >> >> We'd need to remove the compatibility layer in similarities but it can be >> done as a follow-up. >> >> Thanks for taking care of this! >> >> Le jeu. 29 juin 2017 à 23:12, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> a écrit : >> >>> Adrien, I’ve pushed some more changes and seems like I’d have to >>> regenerate some test indexes but I’m not sure how to do that. Do you mind >>> taking a look at this in it’s current form, and also my commits? It is all >>> @ my fork here: https://github.com/anshumg/lucene-solr >>> >>> P.S: I thought it’d make more sense to do this on a feature-branch but >>> the upgrade script wasn’t happy about that. >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 9:20 AM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> Going with your suggestions, seems like we’d be wiping out all of the >>> backward-codecs folder/package, is that correct ? Also, do we need to put >>> in anything to ensure back-combat between 6x, and 7x? >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:21 AM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> Thanks Adrien, I’d want to try and do this myself as long as you can >>> validate the correctness :). >>> >>> I’ll be working on this in a few hours and should have an update later >>> today and hopefully we’d wrap it up soon. >>> >>> -Anshum >>> >>> >>> >>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 10:39 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> If you don't want to do it, I can do it tomorrow but if you'd like to >>> give it a try I'd be happy to help if you need any guidance. >>> >>> Le mer. 28 juin 2017 à 19:38, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>>> Hi Anshum, >>>> >>>> This looks like a good start to me. You would also need to remove the >>>> 6.x version constants so that TestBackwardCompatibility does not think they >>>> are worth testing, as well as all codecs, postings formats and doc values >>>> formats that are defined in the lucene/backward-codecs module since they >>>> are only about 6.x codecs. >>>> >>>> Le mer. 28 juin 2017 à 09:57, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> a >>>> écrit : >>>> >>>>> Thanks for confirming that Alan, I had similar thoughts but wasn’t >>>>> sure. >>>>> >>>>> I don’t want to change anything that I’m not confident about so I’m >>>>> just going to create remove those and commit it to my fork. If someone >>>>> who’s confident agrees with what I’m doing, I’ll go ahead and make those >>>>> changes to the upstream :). >>>>> >>>>> -Anshum >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 28, 2017, at 12:54 AM, Alan Woodward <a...@flax.co.uk> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> We don’t need to support lucene5x codecs in 7, so you should be able >>>>> to just remove those tests (and the the relevant packages from >>>>> backwards-codecs too), I think? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 28 Jun 2017, at 08:38, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I tried to move forward to see this work before automatically >>>>> computing the versions but I have about 30 odd failing test. I’ve made >>>>> those changes and pushed to my local GitHub account in case you have the >>>>> time to look: https://github.com/anshumg/lucene-solr >>>>> >>>>> Here’s the build summary if that helps: >>>>> >>>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 31C3B60E557C7E14] (first 10 out >>>>> of 31): >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testOutliers2 >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testShortRange >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testFewValues >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testFullLongRange >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testRamBytesUsed >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testFewLargeValues >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testByteRange >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene53.TestLucene53NormsFormat.testLongRange >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene50.TestLucene50SegmentInfoFormat.testRandomExceptions >>>>> [junit4] - >>>>> org.apache.lucene.codecs.lucene62.TestLucene62SegmentInfoFormat.testRandomExceptions >>>>> [junit4] >>>>> [junit4] >>>>> [junit4] JVM J0: 0.56 .. 9.47 = 8.91s >>>>> [junit4] JVM J1: 0.56 .. 4.13 = 3.57s >>>>> [junit4] JVM J2: 0.56 .. 47.28 = 46.73s >>>>> [junit4] JVM J3: 0.56 .. 3.89 = 3.33s >>>>> [junit4] Execution time total: 47 seconds >>>>> [junit4] Tests summary: 8 suites, 215 tests, 30 errors, 1 failure, >>>>> 24 ignored (24 assumptions) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Anshum >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 27, 2017, at 4:15 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The test***BackwardCompatibility cases can be removed since they make >>>>> sure that Lucene 7 can read Lucene 6 norms, while Lucene 8 doesn't have to >>>>> be able to read Lucene 6 norms. >>>>> >>>>> TestSegmentInfos needs to be adapted to the new versions, we need to >>>>> replace 5 with 6 and 8 with 9. Maybe we should compute those numbers >>>>> automatically based on Version.LATEST.major so that it does not require >>>>> manual changes when moving to a new major version. That would give 5 -> >>>>> Version.LATEST.major-2 and 8 -> Version.LATEST.major+1. >>>>> >>>>> I can do those changes on Thursday if you don't feel comfortable doing >>>>> them. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Le mar. 27 juin 2017 à 08:12, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> a >>>>> écrit : >>>>> >>>>>> Without making any changes at all and just bumping up the version, I >>>>>> hit these errors when running the tests: >>>>>> >>>>>> [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test >>>>>> -Dtestcase=TestSegmentInfos -Dtests.method=testIllegalCreatedVersion >>>>>> -Dtests.seed=C818A61FA6C293A1 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=es-PR >>>>>> -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT+4 -Dtests.asserts=true >>>>>> -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII >>>>>> [junit4] FAILURE 0.01s J0 | >>>>>> TestSegmentInfos.testIllegalCreatedVersion <<< >>>>>> [junit4] > Throwable #1: junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: >>>>>> Expected exception IllegalArgumentException but no exception was thrown >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C818A61FA6C293A1:CE340683BE44C211]:0) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.util.LuceneTestCase.expectThrows(LuceneTestCase.java:2672) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testIllegalCreatedVersion(TestSegmentInfos.java:35) >>>>>> [junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >>>>>> [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test >>>>>> -Dtestcase=TestSegmentInfos -Dtests.method=testVersionsOneSegment >>>>>> -Dtests.seed=C818A61FA6C293A1 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=es-PR >>>>>> -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT+4 -Dtests.asserts=true >>>>>> -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII >>>>>> [junit4] ERROR 0.00s J0 | >>>>>> TestSegmentInfos.testVersionsOneSegment <<< >>>>>> [junit4] > Throwable #1: >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: segments file recorded >>>>>> indexCreatedVersionMajor=8 but segment=_0(7.0.0):C1 has older >>>>>> version=7.0.0 >>>>>> (resource=BufferedChecksumIndexInput(MockIndexInputWrapper(RAMInputStream(name=segments_1)))) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C818A61FA6C293A1:A7477EE8875F2E36]:0) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCommit(SegmentInfos.java:392) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCommit(SegmentInfos.java:293) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$1.doBody(SegmentInfos.java:443) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$1.doBody(SegmentInfos.java:440) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:692) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:644) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readLatestCommit(SegmentInfos.java:445) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testVersionsOneSegment(TestSegmentInfos.java:67) >>>>>> [junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >>>>>> [junit4] 2> NOTE: reproduce with: ant test >>>>>> -Dtestcase=TestSegmentInfos -Dtests.method=testVersionsTwoSegments >>>>>> -Dtests.seed=C818A61FA6C293A1 -Dtests.slow=true -Dtests.locale=es-PR >>>>>> -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT+4 -Dtests.asserts=true >>>>>> -Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII >>>>>> [junit4] ERROR 0.00s J0 | >>>>>> TestSegmentInfos.testVersionsTwoSegments <<< >>>>>> [junit4] > Throwable #1: >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.CorruptIndexException: segments file recorded >>>>>> indexCreatedVersionMajor=8 but segment=_0(7.0.0):C1 has older >>>>>> version=7.0.0 >>>>>> (resource=BufferedChecksumIndexInput(MockIndexInputWrapper(RAMInputStream(name=segments_1)))) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> __randomizedtesting.SeedInfo.seed([C818A61FA6C293A1:4EE9CC4194FBB648]:0) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCommit(SegmentInfos.java:392) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readCommit(SegmentInfos.java:293) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$1.doBody(SegmentInfos.java:443) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$1.doBody(SegmentInfos.java:440) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:692) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos$FindSegmentsFile.run(SegmentInfos.java:644) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.readLatestCommit(SegmentInfos.java:445) >>>>>> [junit4] > at >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testVersionsTwoSegments(TestSegmentInfos.java:96) >>>>>> [junit4] > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) >>>>>> >>>>>> On applying the patch here (https://pastebin.com/tM4Fpy1Q), I end up >>>>>> with the following errors: >>>>>> >>>>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 5B388AB1E2BEFF87]: >>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestSimilarityBase.testLengthEncodingBackwardCompatibility >>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestClassicSimilarity.testNormEncodingBackwardCompatibility >>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testIllegalCreatedVersion >>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>> org.apache.lucene.search.similarities.TestBM25Similarity.testLengthEncodingBackwardCompatibility >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas on what I’m missing here? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Jun 26, 2017, at 2:55 PM, Ryan Ernst <r...@iernst.net> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> After changing that constant check, do you get the same test >>>>>> failures? What are the actual failure messages? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 10:38 AM Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks Adrien, sadly, the tests aren't passing. That's the reason >>>>>>> why I didn't push the changes. I'll see if someone else can help while >>>>>>> you're away. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 9:55 AM Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Your proposed change looks correct to me. As far as whether other >>>>>>>> changes are required, I'm currently traveling but can look when I'm >>>>>>>> back on >>>>>>>> Thursday. Feel free to push the branches if tests are passing, we can >>>>>>>> fix >>>>>>>> things later? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le lun. 26 juin 2017 à 07:13, Anshum Gupta <ans...@anshumgupta.net> >>>>>>>> a écrit : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The only throw case that I think needs changing is in >>>>>>>>> SegmentInfos.java L315 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Version luceneVersion = Version.fromBits(input.readVInt(), >>>>>>>>> input.readVInt(), input.readVInt()); >>>>>>>>> if (luceneVersion.onOrAfter(Version.LUCENE_7_0_0) == false) { >>>>>>>>> // TODO: should we check indexCreatedVersion instead? >>>>>>>>> throw new IndexFormatTooOldException(input, "this index is too old >>>>>>>>> (version: " + luceneVersion + ")"); >>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The Lucene version here should be LUCENE_7_0_0, instead of the >>>>>>>>> original LUCENE_6_0_0. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there anything else that's needed (and is this the correct >>>>>>>>> change?). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 9:45 PM Anshum Gupta < >>>>>>>>> ans...@anshumgupta.net> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I am working on creating the 7x, and 7.0 branches but I have the >>>>>>>>>> following failing tests: >>>>>>>>>> [junit4] Tests with failures [seed: 4FBDDCD3F96316D3]: >>>>>>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testVersionsTwoSegments >>>>>>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testIllegalCreatedVersion >>>>>>>>>> [junit4] - >>>>>>>>>> org.apache.lucene.index.TestSegmentInfos.testVersionsOneSegment >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I assume this is a result of me not doing anything about the >>>>>>>>>> following TODO that got printed when I ran addVersion.py. >>>>>>>>>> *TODO* >>>>>>>>>> * - Update IndexFormatTooOldException throw cases* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can someone shed more light on what needs to be done here? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Anshum >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- > Uwe Schindler > Achterdiek 19, 28357 Bremen > https://www.thetaphi.de > > >
