[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Adrien Grand updated LUCENE-7837:
---------------------------------
    Fix Version/s: master (8.0)

> Use indexCreatedVersionMajor to fail opening too old indices
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-7837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-7837
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: master (8.0)
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-7837.patch
>
>
> Even though in theory we only support reading indices created with version N 
> or N-1, in practice it is possible to run a forceMerge in order to make 
> Lucene accept to open the index since we only record the version that wrote 
> segments and commit points. However as of Lucene 7.0, we also record the 
> major version that was used to initially create the index, meaning we could 
> also fail to open N-2 indices that have only been merged with version N-1.
> The current state of things where we could read old data without knowing it 
> raises issues with everything that is performed on top of the codec API such 
> as analysis, input validation or norms encoding, especially now that we plan 
> to change the defaults (LUCENE-7730).
> For instance, we are only starting to reject broken offsets in term vectors 
> in Lucene 7. If we do not enforce the index to be created with either Lucene 
> 7 or 8 once we move to Lucene 8, then it means codecs could still be fed with 
> broken offsets, which is a pity since assuming that offsets go forward makes 
> things easier to encode and also potentially allows for better compression.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to