[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Erick Erickson updated SOLR-10742:
----------------------------------
    Description: 
SolrCores.getNamesForCore iterates through all the cores to find all the 
aliases to this core. It does this in a synchronized block which blocks other 
core operations.

For installations with many cores this can be a performance issue. I'm not sure 
it makes sense to do it this way anyway, perhaps SolrCore should have a list of 
its current aliases and we can be more efficient about this? Or otherwise get 
this information in a less heavy-weight fashion?

I'm assigning this to myself to keep track of it, but anyone who wants to grab 
it please feel free.



  was:
SolrCores.getCoreNames iterates through all the cores to find all the aliases 
to this core. It does this in a synchronized block which blocks other core 
operations.

For installations with many cores this can be a performance issue. I'm not sure 
it makes sense to do it this way anyway, perhaps SolrCore should have a list of 
its current aliases and we can be more efficient about this? Or otherwise get 
this information in a less heavy-weight fashion?

I'm assigning this to myself to keep track of it, but anyone who wants to grab 
it please feel free.




> SolrCores.getNamesForCore is quite inefficient and blocks other core 
> operations
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-10742
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10742
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Erick Erickson
>            Assignee: Erick Erickson
>
> SolrCores.getNamesForCore iterates through all the cores to find all the 
> aliases to this core. It does this in a synchronized block which blocks other 
> core operations.
> For installations with many cores this can be a performance issue. I'm not 
> sure it makes sense to do it this way anyway, perhaps SolrCore should have a 
> list of its current aliases and we can be more efficient about this? Or 
> otherwise get this information in a less heavy-weight fashion?
> I'm assigning this to myself to keep track of it, but anyone who wants to 
> grab it please feel free.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to