[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11042?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Andrey Kudryavtsev updated SOLR-11042: -------------------------------------- Description: I have a couple of use cases where I need to sort result list by function query values (something like {{sort query(..) desc}} or {{sort product(...) asc}} ) Even if that {{...}} could be pretty complicated query with lots of clauses, this technique worked like a charm until I created a query in incorrect Solr's syntax , i.e. I created a string which {{FunctionQParser}} failed to parse ( I had something that in simplification could be described as {{sort=query($sortQuery) desc&sortQuery=type: a b c}} without proper {{df}} ). This lead to unexpected behaviour (at least from my pov). See [SortSpecParsing#parseSortSpecImpl|https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/e2521b2a8baabdaf43b92192588f51e042d21e97/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SortSpecParsing.java#L88] : * FunctionQParser failed to parse query, but exception wasn't thrown: {code} catch (Exception e) { // hang onto this in case the string isn't a full field name either qParserException = e;; } {code} * Solr tried to handle sorting clause as a field and made a lookup into Schema: {code} SchemaField sf = schema.getFieldOrNull(field); if (null == sf) { ...... {code} * I had a "match all" field type mapped on {{*}} in schema, and this type was matched by string {{query($sortQuery)}} * Then there are two possibilities (and I don't like both of them): ** If "match all" field type is multi valued, there would be an exception {code} can not sort on multivalued field: query($sortQuery) {code} ** If "match all" field type is single valued, then it would try to sort by values for field {{query($sortQuery)}} (without any exceptions) I understand (by tests running) from where this error hiding came from. But what if we will make some basic efforts to help guys like me to detect errors in syntax as soon as possible (see [^SOLR-11042.patch]) ? WDYT? was: I have a couple of use cases where I need to sort result list by function query values (something like {{sort query(..) desc}} or {{sort product(...) asc}} ) Even if that {{...}} could be pretty complicated query with lots of clauses, this technique worked like a charm until I created a query in incorrect Solr's syntax , i.e. I created a string which {{FunctionQParser}} failed to parse ( I had something that in simplification could be described as {{sort=query($sortQuery) desc&sortQuery=type: a b c}} without proper {{df}} ). This lead to unexpected behaviour (at least from my pov). See [SortSpecParsing#parseSortSpecImpl|https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/e2521b2a8baabdaf43b92192588f51e042d21e97/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SortSpecParsing.java#L88] : * FunctionQParser failed to parse query, but exception wasn't thrown: {code} catch (Exception e) { // hang onto this in case the string isn't a full field name either qParserException = e;; } {code} * Solr tried to handle sorting clause as a field and made a lookup into Schema: {code} SchemaField sf = schema.getFieldOrNull(field); if (null == sf) { ...... {code} * I had a "match all" field type mapped on {{*}} in schema, and this type was matched by string {{query($sortQuery)}} * Then there are two possibilities (and I don't like both of them): ** If "match all" field type is multi valued, there would be an exception {code} can not sort on multivalued field: query($sortQuery) {code} ** If "match all" field type is single valued, then it would try to sort by values for field {{query($sortQuery)}} (without any exceptions) I understand (by tests running) from where this error hiding came from. But what if we will make some basic efforts to help guys like me to detect errors in syntax as soon as possible (see patch attached) ? WDYT? > Sort by function query: throw exception if can't parse > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-11042 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11042 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) > Affects Versions: 7.0 > Reporter: Andrey Kudryavtsev > Priority: Minor > Labels: patch > Attachments: SOLR-11042.patch > > > I have a couple of use cases where I need to sort result list by function > query values (something like {{sort query(..) desc}} or {{sort product(...) > asc}} ) > Even if that {{...}} could be pretty complicated query with lots of clauses, > this technique worked like a charm until I created a query in incorrect > Solr's syntax , i.e. I created a string which {{FunctionQParser}} failed to > parse ( I had something that in simplification could be described as > {{sort=query($sortQuery) desc&sortQuery=type: a b c}} without proper {{df}} ). > This lead to unexpected behaviour (at least from my pov). See > [SortSpecParsing#parseSortSpecImpl|https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/e2521b2a8baabdaf43b92192588f51e042d21e97/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SortSpecParsing.java#L88] > : > * FunctionQParser failed to parse query, but exception wasn't thrown: > {code} > catch (Exception e) { > // hang onto this in case the string isn't a full field name > either > qParserException = e;; > } > {code} > * Solr tried to handle sorting clause as a field and made a lookup into > Schema: > {code} > SchemaField sf = schema.getFieldOrNull(field); > if (null == sf) { > ...... > {code} > * I had a "match all" field type mapped on {{*}} in schema, and this type > was matched by string {{query($sortQuery)}} > * Then there are two possibilities (and I don't like both of them): > ** If "match all" field type is multi valued, there would be an exception > {code} > can not sort on multivalued field: query($sortQuery) > {code} > ** If "match all" field type is single valued, then it would try to sort by > values for field {{query($sortQuery)}} (without any exceptions) > I understand (by tests running) from where this error hiding came from. > But what if we will make some basic efforts to help guys like me to detect > errors in syntax as soon as possible (see [^SOLR-11042.patch]) ? WDYT? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.14#64029) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org