Hello, There appears to be an error in the comments in the Solr 6.6 example schemas. No responses except for one offline to this issue in the Solr users list so I am posting to the dev list with the hope to fix the comments if they are indeed in error. See below. Should I open a JIRA issue?
The comments in the example schema's for Solr 6.6, state that the StrField type must be single-valued to support doc values For example Solr-6.6.0/server/solr/configsets/basic_configs/conf/ managed-schema: 216 <!-- The StrField type is not analyzed, but indexed/stored verbatim. 217 It supports doc values but in that case the field needs to be 218 single-valued and either required or have a default value. 219 --> However, on line 221 a StrField is declared with docValues that is multiValued: 221 <fieldType name="strings" class="solr.StrField" sortMissingLast="true" multiValued="true" docValues="true" /> Also note that the comments above say that the field must either be required or have a default value, but line 221 appears to satisfy neither condition. The JavaDocs indicate that StrField can be multi-valued https://lucene. apache.org/core/6_6_0//core/org/apache/lucene/index/DocValuesType.html Is the comment in the example schema file completely wrong, or is there some issue with using a docValues with a multivalued StrField? Tom Burton-West https://www.hathitrust.org/blogslarge-scale-search
