On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Chris Hostetter <[email protected]> wrote: > > The point is: If you find yourself getting into the habit of refering to > config values/settings in the example configs as "the defaults" then you > *will* misslead users into thinking that you are describing the "default > behavior" when those values/settings are absent from the configs. >
I'm not going to really get hung on the technicalities here. We can call what happens when there is "no configuration" the "fallback settings", if thats less confusing, but to me the example is the defaults. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
