I have the same opinion. I’ll let this vote run :) -Anshum
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 7:52 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > My opinion: Let’s get 7.0 out ASAP. I don’t think the DIH db example problem > should be a blocker. > > -- > Steve > www.lucidworks.com > >> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com> wrote: >> >> Thanks for bringing this up and testing the RC out :). I am on the same page >> as Adrien, about the release being stuck, but having said I think that it's >> been in that position for good. >> >> As far as respiring the RC goes, I am happy to do that but if this is just a >> DIH 'example' issue, and as much as I'd want a completely fixed RC, we might >> still be ok moving ahead. >> >> If others feel that we should respin, I think we should merge in changes >> from 7x into 7.0. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> -Anshum >> >> >> >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 6:00 AM, Adrien Grand <jpou...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 SUCCESS! [2:06:13.881329] >>> >>> Regarding the broken dih example and whether we should respin, we have been >>> trying to release 7.0.0 for more than two months and we already accumulated >>> more than enough good changes to release 7.1.0. I'm worried about letting >>> 7.0 slip for another couple weeks. So if we decide to cancel this vote, I >>> think we should also consider merging branch_7x into branch_7_0 and >>> restarting the release process from scratch. My preference is still to >>> release 7.0 from branch_7_0 as soon as possible and start working on 7.1 in >>> the coming weeks, but then we might need to increase the bug severity that >>> is required to warrant a respin. >>> >>> Le lun. 11 sept. 2017 à 12:52, Dawid Weiss <dawid.we...@gmail.com> a écrit : >>> SUCCESS! [0:56:11.512628] >>> >>> +1. >>> >>> D. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Jan Høydahl <jan....@cominvent.com> wrote: >>>> Thanks Christine >>>> >>>> The WARN msgs are not blockers. >>>> However, I tested the DIH ‘db’ example with 6.6.0 and it works, indexing >>>> 16 >>>> documents. >>>> Also re-tested the example directly in branch_7_0 and it fails there too, >>>> so >>>> this seems to be a regression, but I don’t know what the bug is. >>>> >>>> Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11348 as a blocker for >>>> this, leaving it up to RM to lower the severity if the vote passes. >>>> >>>> -0 >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>>> >>>> 11. sep. 2017 kl. 04.53 skrev Christine Poerschke (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) >>>> <cpoersc...@bloomberg.net>: >>>> >>>> Thanks Jan for these observations! >>>> >>>> The Couldn't add files WARNing seems be pre-existing and I've created >>>> SOLR-11346 to explore if actually it should be an ERROR/exception. >>>> >>>> About the solr.LatLonType WARNing, does the DIH example actually use those >>>> field types? If not could they simply be removed instead of replaced, >>>> unless >>>> perhaps we wish to keep all the example configs similar as much as possible >>>> even if that means that some examples will have unused stuff? >>>> >>>> Those are my observations i.e. also not a vote. >>>> >>>> Christine >>>> >>>> From: dev@lucene.apache.org At: 09/10/17 22:19:11 >>>> To: dev@lucene.apache.org >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0 RC3 >>>> >>>> DIH example that failed in RC2 now loads, but still with three WARN level >>>> logs which is not ideal from a fresh install... >>>> >>>> WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:02.927; [ x:mail] >>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrConfig; Couldn't add files from >>>> /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib filtered >>>> by >>>> .*\.jar to classpath: >>>> /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/contrib/dataimporthandler/lib >>>> WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:db] >>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated >>>> plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult documentation how >>>> to >>>> replace it accordingly. >>>> WARN - 2017-09-10 20:44:03.454; [ x:mail] >>>> org.apache.solr.core.SolrResourceLoader; Solr loaded a deprecated >>>> plugin/analysis class [solr.LatLonType]. Please consult documentation how >>>> to >>>> replace it accordingly. >>>> >>>> >>>> However, DIH “db” example does not work ootb. But it could have been broken >>>> in earlier versions too? >>>> >>>> ERROR - 2017-09-10 20:46:29.317; [ x:db] >>>> org.apache.solr.common.SolrException; Exception while processing: item >>>> document : SolrInputDocument(fields: >>>> []):org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException: Unable >>>> to >>>> execute query: select * from item Processing Document # 1 >>>> at >>>> org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.DataImportHandlerException.wrapAndThrow(DataImportHandlerException.java:69) >>>> … >>>> Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: error in script file line: 2 >>>> /Users/janhoy/Downloads/solr-7.0.0/example/example-DIH/hsqldb/ex system >>>> object cannot be modified in statement [CREATE CACHED TABLE ITEM(ID >>>> CHAR(8),NAME VARCHAR(100),MANU VARCHAR(50),WEIGHT REAL,PRICE >>>> REAL,POPULARITY >>>> INTEGER,INCLUDES VARCHAR(200),LAST_MODIFIED TIMESTAMP DEFAULT NOW)] >>>> at org.hsqldb.jdbc.JDBCUtil.sqlException(Unknown Source) >>>> >>>> >>>> The “files” example that failed in RC2 now works. >>>> >>>> This is not a vote, just an observation :) Will run smoke tester later. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect >>>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com >>>> >>>> 9. sep. 2017 kl. 07.10 skrev Anshum Gupta <ansh...@apple.com>: >>>> >>>> Please vote for the third release candidate for Apache Lucene/Solr 7.0.0. >>>> >>>> Artifacts can be downloaded from: >>>> >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ >>>> >>>> You can run the smoke tester directly from this command: >>>> >>>> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py >>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-7.0.0-RC3-rev3ba304b29825a94249c5145b3f5061e87b87d8f8/ >>>> >>>> Reminder: You would need to run this from branch_7_0. >>>> >>>> Here's my +1: >>>> >>>> SUCCESS! [0:35:25.819530] >>>> >>>> -Anshum >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >>> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org >
