[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13048358#comment-13048358
 ] 

Martijn van Groningen commented on SOLR-2564:
---------------------------------------------

After some more testing I think it is better to disable the group cache by 
default.
Here are my small test results on a index of 30M documents. Test were produced 
on a low end machine.
||Query type||Query||Nr of matches||Search time with caching||Search time 
without caching||
|Term query|country:es|24270711|2564|2261| 
|Boolean query|country:es OR country:tr|25951654|4014 |4170|
|Fuzzy query|region:riviera~0.001|977043|146|189|
|Wildcard query|region:r*|1608781|177|190|
|Complexer boolean query|region:r* OR region:riveria~0.0001 OR country:es OR 
country:tr|27582783|5328|7289|
So I think that we can conclude from here is that the group cache work well for 
boolean, wildcard and fuzzy queries.

> Integrating grouping module into Solr 4.0
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2564
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2564
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Martijn van Groningen
>            Assignee: Martijn van Groningen
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch, 
> SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch, SOLR-2564.patch
>
>
> Since work on grouping module is going well. I think it is time to wire this 
> up in Solr.
> Besides the current grouping features Solr provides, Solr will then also 
> support second pass caching and total count based on groups.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to