[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16211496#comment-16211496
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-11490:
------------------------------------
I still think its confusing having these solr version numbers here. There was
already a recent discussion by Jan about this with respect to solr xml in these
files, too: LUCENE-7964
I am concerned about setting the precedent, and putting more solr version
numbers like this in other lucene sources and confusing users even more. IMO
they already have enough to be confused about :)
> Add @since javadoc tags to the interesting Solr/Lucene classes
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11490
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11490
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Assignee: Alexandre Rafalovitch
> Priority: Minor
>
> As per the discussion on the dev list, it may be useful to add Javadoc since
> tags to significant (or even all) Java files.
> For user-facing files (such as analyzers, URPs, stream evaluators, etc) it
> would be useful when trying to identifying whether a particular class only
> comes later than user's particular version.
> For other classes, it may be useful for historical reasons.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
