[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16272262#comment-16272262
 ] 

Cao Manh Dat commented on SOLR-11458:
-------------------------------------

This bug relates to HDFS lease recovery. When data dir of a replica (core_node7 
in this case) get deleted and get recovered when a new collection of the same 
name gets created.

@markrmil...@gmail.com : for newly created core, should we skip lease recovery??


> Bugs in MoveReplicaCmd handling of failures
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11458
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11458
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>    Affects Versions: 7.0, 7.0.1, 7.1, master (8.0)
>            Reporter: Andrzej Bialecki 
>            Assignee: Andrzej Bialecki 
>
> Spin-off from SOLR-11449:
> {quote}
> There's a section of code in moveNormalReplica that ensures that we don't 
> lose a shard leader during move. There's no corresponding protection in 
> moveHdfsReplica, which means that moving a replica that is also a shard 
> leader may potentially lead to data loss (eg. when replicationFactor=1).
> Also, there's no rollback strategy when moveHdfsReplica partially fails, 
> unlike in moveNormalReplica where the code simply skips deleting the original 
> replica - it seems that the code should attempt to restore the original 
> replica in this case? When RF=1 and such failure occurs then not restoring 
> the original replica means lost shard.
> {quote}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to