[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16316913#comment-16316913
 ] 

Cassandra Targett commented on SOLR-11741:
------------------------------------------

bq. What i suggested at one point (I don't remember where ... it may already be 
in a jira somewhere?) was an UpdateRequestProcessorFactory that could be 
configured instead of RunUpdateProcessorFactory in a chain...

The issue where Hoss mentioned this idea before was SOLR-6939. I linked it here 
for reference.

> Offline training mode for schema guessing
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11741
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11741
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>            Reporter: Ishan Chattopadhyaya
>         Attachments: RuleForMostAccomodatingField.png, SOLR-11741-temp.patch, 
> screenshot-1.png, screenshot-3.png
>
>
> Our data driven schema guessing doesn't work under many situations. For 
> example, if the first document has a field with value "0", it is guessed as 
> Long and subsequent fields with "0.0" are rejected. Similarly, if the same 
> field had alphanumeric contents for a latter document, those documents are 
> rejected. Also, single vs. multi valued field guessing is not ideal.
> Proposing an offline training mode where Solr accepts bunch of documents and 
> returns a guessed schema (without indexing). This schema can then be used for 
> actual indexing. I think the original idea is from Hoss.
> I think initial implementation can be based on an UpdateRequestProcessor. We 
> can hash out the API soon, as we go along.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to