+1 On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Sanne Grinovero <sanne.grinov...@gmail.com>wrote:
> +1 > > All tests are fine on both Infinispan and Hibernate Search. > > While I understand that often APIs needed changes, I'm very happy to > state that for the first time three mayor releases are fully API > compatible! > (As far as tested on these projects, Lucene versions 3.1.0, 3.2.0, > 3.3.0 are drop-in compatible replacements) > > Regards, > Sanne > > 2011/6/26 Steven A Rowe <sar...@syr.edu>: > > +1 > > > > I looked at the differences, and then just ran tests on the Solr and > Lucene source tarballs. > > > > Steve > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 11:12 AM > >> To: dev@lucene.apache.org > >> Subject: [VOTE] release 3.3 (take two) > >> > >> Artifacts here: > >> > >> http://s.apache.org/lusolr330rc1 > >> > >> working release notes here: > >> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/ReleaseNote33 > >> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ReleaseNote33 > >> > >> To see the changes between the previous release candidate (rc0): > >> svn diff -r 1139028:1139775 > >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/dev/branches/lucene_solr_3_3 > >> > >> Here is my +1 > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > -- Chris Male | Software Developer | JTeam BV.| www.jteam.nl
