[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16368383#comment-16368383 ]
Adam Gibson commented on SOLR-11838: ------------------------------------ Just of note if you use, deeplearning4j-nn, and the nd4j apis you don't actually need deeplearning4j-core. Behind the scenes we've been working on modularizing core out quite a bit. We may be able to help you here. What components of dl4j are you using? >From the looks of it, it's just the configuration and some of the basic nd4j >apis. You can get away without using core. That should simplify things quite a bit. > explore supporting Deeplearning4j NeuralNetwork models > ------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-11838 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11838 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: New Feature > Reporter: Christine Poerschke > Priority: Major > Attachments: SOLR-11838.patch, SOLR-11838.patch > > > [~yuyano] wrote in SOLR-11597: > bq. ... If we think to apply this to more complex neural networks in the > future, we will need to support layers ... > [~malcorn_redhat] wrote in SOLR-11597: > bq. ... In my opinion, if this is a route Solr eventually wants to go, I > think a better strategy would be to just add a dependency on > [Deeplearning4j|https://deeplearning4j.org/] ... > Creating this ticket for the idea to be explored further (if anyone is > interested in exploring it), complimentary to and independent of the > SOLR-11597 RankNet related effort. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.6.3#76005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org