[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11838?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16368383#comment-16368383
]
Adam Gibson commented on SOLR-11838:
------------------------------------
Just of note if you use, deeplearning4j-nn, and the nd4j apis you don't
actually need
deeplearning4j-core. Behind the scenes we've been working on modularizing core
out quite a bit.
We may be able to help you here. What components of dl4j are you using?
>From the looks of it, it's just the configuration and some of the basic nd4j
>apis.
You can get away without using core. That should simplify things quite a bit.
> explore supporting Deeplearning4j NeuralNetwork models
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-11838
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11838
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Christine Poerschke
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-11838.patch, SOLR-11838.patch
>
>
> [~yuyano] wrote in SOLR-11597:
> bq. ... If we think to apply this to more complex neural networks in the
> future, we will need to support layers ...
> [~malcorn_redhat] wrote in SOLR-11597:
> bq. ... In my opinion, if this is a route Solr eventually wants to go, I
> think a better strategy would be to just add a dependency on
> [Deeplearning4j|https://deeplearning4j.org/] ...
> Creating this ticket for the idea to be explored further (if anyone is
> interested in exploring it), complimentary to and independent of the
> SOLR-11597 RankNet related effort.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
