[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13055580#comment-13055580
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1889:
-------------------------------------
Hi Mike, Simon has an issue open to make a lot of what you are talking about
wrt positions easier:
LUCENE-2878
In my opinion once LUCENE-2878 is resolved, we may want to then consider adding
the capability for a codec to encode the offset deltas in parallel with the
positions (so its just a stream of delta-encoded integers you read in parallel
with the positions for things like highlighting).
Then, highlighting would not require term vectors anymore right? I think this
would be much faster and more efficient without the space waste of term
vectors, and we could prototype such a thing by encoding these ourselves into
the payloads... which is close to the same, but I think ultimately optionally
supporting offsets this way will be better especially with block-oriented
compression algorithms.
> FastVectorHighlighter: support for additional queries
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1889
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1889
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Wish
> Components: modules/highlighter
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1889.patch
>
>
> I am using fastvectorhighlighter for some strange languages and it is working
> well!
> One thing i noticed immediately is that many query types are not highlighted
> (multitermquery, multiphrasequery, etc)
> Here is one thing Michael M posted in the original ticket:
> {quote}
> I think a nice [eventual] model would be if we could simply re-run the
> scorer on the single document (using InstantiatedIndex maybe, or
> simply some sort of wrapper on the term vectors which are already a
> mini-inverted-index for a single doc), but extend the scorer API to
> tell us the exact term occurrences that participated in a match (which
> I don't think is exposed today).
> {quote}
> Due to strange requirements I am using something similar to this (but
> specialized to our case).
> I am doing strange things like forcing multitermqueries to rewrite into
> boolean queries so they will be highlighted,
> and flattening multiphrasequeries into boolean or'ed phrasequeries.
> I do not think these things would be 'fast', but i had a few ideas that might
> help:
> * looking at contrib/highlighter, you can support FilteredQuery in flatten()
> by calling getQuery() right?
> * maybe as a last resort, try Query.extractTerms() ?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
