[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Chris Male updated LUCENE-3256:
-------------------------------

    Attachment: LUCENE-3256.patch

New patch which addresses the scoring problem in BoostedQuery.

Everything compiles and passes.

> Consolidate CustomScoreQuery, ValueSourceQuery and BoostedQuery 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3256
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3256
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: core/search
>            Reporter: Chris Male
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-3256.patch, LUCENE-3256.patch
>
>
> Lucene's CustomScoreQuery and Solr's BoostedQuery do essentially the same 
> thing: they boost the scores of Documents by the value from a ValueSource.  
> BoostedQuery does this in a direct fashion, by accepting a ValueSource. 
> CustomScoreQuery on the other hand, accepts a series of ValueSourceQuerys.  
> ValueSourceQuery seems to do exactly the same thing as FunctionQuery.
> With Lucene's ValueSource being deprecated / removed, we need to resolve 
> these dependencies and simplify the code.
> Therefore I recommend we do the following things:
> - Move CustomScoreQuery (and CustomScoreProvider) to the new Queries module 
> and change it over to use FunctionQuerys instead of ValueSourceQuerys.  
> - Deprecate Solr's BoostedQuery in favour of the new CustomScoreQuery.  CSQ 
> provides a lot of support for customizing the scoring process.
> - Move and consolidate all tests of CSQ and BoostedQuery, to the Queries 
> module and have them test CSQ instead.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to