[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11891?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Hoss Man updated SOLR-11891:
----------------------------
    Attachment: SOLR-11891.patch.BAD

> BinaryResponseWriter fetches unnecessary fields
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-11891
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11891
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public) 
>          Components: Response Writers
>    Affects Versions: 5.4, 6.4.2, 6.6.2
>            Reporter: wei wang
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: DocsStreamer.java.diff, SOLR-11891.patch.BAD
>
>
> We observe that solr query time increases significantly with the number of 
> rows requested,  even all we retrieve for each document is just fl=id,score.  
> Debugged a bit and see that most of the increased time was spent in 
> BinaryResponseWriter,  converting lucene document into SolrDocument.  Inside 
> convertLuceneDocToSolrDoc():   
> [https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/df874432b9a17b547acb24a01d3491839e6a6b69/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/response/DocsStreamer.java#L182]
>  
> I am a bit puzzled why we need to iterate through all the fields in the 
> document. Why can’t we just iterate through the requested field list?    
> [https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/df874432b9a17b547acb24a01d3491839e6a6b69/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/response/DocsStreamer.java#L156]
>  
> e.g. when pass in the field list as 
> sdoc = convertLuceneDocToSolrDoc(doc, rctx.getSearcher().getSchema(), fnames)
> and just iterate through fnames,  there is a significant performance boost in 
> our case.  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to