[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13057778#comment-13057778
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3260:
--------------------------------------------
Thanks Shai!
The 200+ iterations are exceptionally fast since they only do 1 TermsEnum op
per iter (it's the indexing that'll be slow in this test -- for that I do
numDocs = atLeast(10)). Also, this bug only happens when seekExact is followed
by next, only on certain terms, and only on a multi-seg index. So it seems an
OK investment of CPU for test coverage ;)
> need a test that uses termsenum.seekExact() (which returns true), then calls
> next()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3260
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3260
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-3260.patch
>
>
> i tried to do some seekExact (where the result must exist) then next()ing in
> the faceting module,
> and it seems like there could be a bug here.
> I think we should add a test that mixes seekExact/seekCeil/next like this, to
> ensure that
> if seekExact returns true, that the enum is properly positioned.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
