[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8202?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16411106#comment-16411106
]
Alan Woodward commented on LUCENE-8202:
---------------------------------------
{quote}So I would expect it to be slow, but not to use lots of memory?
{quote}
BaseTokenStreamTestCase.checkAnalysisConsistency() stores all incoming tokens
in a list so that it can then compare them against a second run, so it's a test
issue rather than anything else.
{quote}I would add both
{quote}
+1 - I'll add a max shingle size of four and a max number of stacks of 1000.
> Add a FixedShingleFilter
> ------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8202
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8202
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Alan Woodward
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 7.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-8202.patch, LUCENE-8202.patch, LUCENE-8202.patch
>
>
> In LUCENE-3475 I tried to make a ShingleGraphFilter that could accept and
> emit arbitrary graphs, while duplicating all the functionality of the
> existing ShingleFilter. This ends up being extremely hairy, and doesn't play
> well with query parsers.
> I'd like to step back and try and create a simpler shingle filter that can be
> used for index-time phrase tokenization only. It will have a single fixed
> shingle size, can deal with single-token synonyms, and won't emit unigrams.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
