[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16447779#comment-16447779
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-8268:
-----------------------------------------
a couple of questions:
* in _compareBytesRefArrays_ how can you tell that comparing each individual
term is correct?
* is _BytesRefIterator_ an option as a return value and would it make sense.
It's hart do tell without a single user of this.
* In the current context there is no gain changing this interface. Can we add a
users of multiple terms?
> MatchesIterator.term() should return an array
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-8268
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8268
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Alan Woodward
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: LUCENE-8268.patch
>
>
> At the moment, we return a single BytesRef from MatchesIterator.term(), which
> works well for the queries that currently implement this. This won't be
> enough for queries that operate on more than one term, however, such as
> phrase or Span queries.
> In preparation for LUCENE-8249, this issue will change the method to return
> an array of BytesRef
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
