[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8352?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16509601#comment-16509601
 ] 

Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-8352:
--------------------------------------

Good catch [[email protected]]. I agree this is a bit trappy.

bq. For this reason we should not encourage extensions to TokenStreamComponents

It looks like having the tokenizer in TokenStreamComponents is only useful for 
the default implementation of setReader. So maybe we could remove this 
setReader method, make TokenStreamComponents final, and replace the tokenizer 
field with a {{Consumer<Reader>}} that would be {{tokenizer::setReader}} by 
default? I think [~sokolov]'s use-case would still work.

> Make TokenStreamComponents final
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-8352
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-8352
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: modules/analysis
>            Reporter: Mark Harwood
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The current design is a little trappy. Any specialised subclasses of 
> TokenStreamComponents _(see_ _StandardAnalyzer, ClassicAnalyzer, 
> UAX29URLEmailAnalyzer)_ are discarded by any subsequent Analyzers that wrap 
> them _(see LimitTokenCountAnalyzer, QueryAutoStopWordAnalyzer, 
> ShingleAnalyzerWrapper and other examples in elasticsearch)_. 
> The current design means each AnalyzerWrapper.wrapComponents() implementation 
> discards any custom TokenStreamComponents and replaces it with one of its own 
> choosing (a vanilla TokenStreamComponents class from examples I've seen).
> This is a trap I fell into when writing a custom TokenStreamComponents with a 
> custom setReader() and I wondered why it was not being triggered when wrapped 
> by other analyzers.
> If AnalyzerWrapper is designed to encourage composition it's arguably a 
> mistake to also permit custom TokenStreamComponent subclasses  - the 
> composition process does not preserve the choice of custom classes and any 
> behaviours they might add. For this reason we should not encourage extensions 
> to TokenStreamComponents (or if TSC extensions are required we should somehow 
> mark an Analyzer as "unwrappable" to prevent lossy compositions).
>  
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to