[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16520943#comment-16520943
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-12495:
-----------------------------------
bq.I see; could {"core": "#MINIMUM", "node": "#ANY"} be included with this
issue? Along with per-collection balancing, we'll also need cluster-wide
balancing.
well we already have a global preference which says
{code}
{"minimize" : "cores"}
{code}
Is there anything that's not already addressed by that? I understand that it
won't show any violations if you are already in an imbalanced state.
The problem with implementing a feature like this that you can clearly have
conflicts if you create 2 rules as follows. This can always lead to violations
which are impossible to satisfy
{code}
{"cores" : "#MINIMUM", "node" : "#ANY"}
{"replica" : "#MINIMUM", "shard" : "#EACH", "node" : "#ANY"}
{code}
> Enhance the Autoscaling policy syntax to evenly distribute replicas
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12495
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Components: AutoScaling
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Priority: Major
>
> Support a new function value for {{replica= "#MINIMUM"}}
> {{#MINIMUM}} means the minimum computed value for the given configuration
> the value of replica will be calculated as {{<=
> Math.ceil(number_of_replicas/number_of_valid_nodes) }}
> *example 1:*
> {code:java}
> {"replica" : "#MINIMUM" , "shard" : "#EACH" , "node" : "#ANY"}
> {code}
> *case 1* : nodes=3, replicationFactor=4
> the value of replica will be calculated as {{Math.ceil(4/3) = 2}}
> current state : nodes=3, replicationFactor=2
> this is equivalent to the hard coded rule
> {code:java}
> {"replica" : "<3" , "shard" : "#EACH" , "node" : "#ANY"}
> {code}
> *case 2* :
> current state : nodes=3, replicationFactor=2
> this is equivalent to the hard coded rule
> {code:java}
> {"replica" : "<3" , "shard" : "#EACH" , "node" : "#ANY"}
> {code}
> *example:2*
> {code}
> {"replica" : "#MINIMUM" , "node" : "#ANY"}{code}
> case 1: numShards = 2, replicationFactor=3, nodes = 5
> this is equivalent to the hard coded rule
> {code:java}
> {"replica" : "<3" , "node" : "#ANY"}
> {code}
> *example:3*
> {code}
> {"replica" : "<2" , "shard" : "#EACH" , "port" : "8983"}{code}
> case 1: {{replicationFactor=3, nodes with port 8983 = 2}}
> this is equivalent to the hard coded rule
> {code}
> {"replica" : "<3" , "shard" : "#EACH" , "port" : "8983"}{code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
