Github user barrotsteindev commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/pull/438#discussion_r212803494
--- Diff: solr/server/solr/configsets/_default/conf/solrconfig.xml ---
@@ -1141,11 +1141,13 @@
<updateProcessor class="solr.ParseDoubleFieldUpdateProcessorFactory"
name="parse-double"/>
<updateProcessor class="solr.ParseDateFieldUpdateProcessorFactory"
name="parse-date">
<arr name="format">
- <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm[:ss[.SSS]][z</str>
- <str>yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm[:ss[,SSS]][z</str>
+ <str>yyyy-MM-dd['T'[HH:mm[:ss[.SSS]][z</str>
+ <str>yyyy-MM-dd['T'[HH:mm[:ss[,SSS]][z</str>
<str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm[:ss[.SSS]][z</str>
<str>yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm[:ss[,SSS]][z</str>
- <str>yyyy-MM-dd</str>
+ <str>EEE MMM d [HH:mm:ss ][z ]yyyy</str>
+ <str>EEEE, dd-MMM-yy HH:mm:ss [z</str>
--- End diff --
Oh, now I recall why I added the optional time zone to asctime.
When the optional time zone is added, the pattern covers AKS and EDT date
formats as well.
IMO, it might be beneficial to keep it in the default config.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
