[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Smiley updated SOLR-12782:
--------------------------------
Attachment: SOLR-12782.patch
> UninvertingReader can be avoided if there are no fields to uninvert
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-12782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12782
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Default Security Level. Issues are Public)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: SOLR-12782.patch, SOLR-12782.patch, SOLR-12782.patch,
> SOLR-12782.patch
>
>
> Solr uses UninvertingReader to expose DocValues on fields that don't have
> them, but do have indexed fields that can be inverted via the FieldCache. It
> has an internal constructor that takes the input LeafReader and a mapping of
> field name to UninvertingReader.Type. It builds a new FieldInfos that have
> fields reflecting DocValues. There are two things I'd like to improve here:
> # make this constructor private and instead insist you use a new wrap()
> method that has the opportunity to return the input if there is nothing to
> do. Effectively the logic today would move into this wrap method, and the
> current constructor would be dead simple, and would take the FieldInfos.
> # Do _not_ create a new {{FieldInfo}} object if the existing field is
> suitable (it's DocValuesType can stay the same). The savings here can really
> add up on machines with many indexes & segments. This is in fact what
> motivated the patch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
