[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13071494#comment-13071494
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-3335:
-------------------------------------
{quote}
Should we place a warning on the "Download" and "News" page on Solr and Lucene
website? The risk is high that you corrupt your index, if you index using these
JDK versions.
{quote}
Not totally sure, the issue is not so different from LUCENE-2975: if we can we
make a easy workaround I think (there are 2 possible ones on this issue for the
Porter bug), we give it our best try, and we get it out in a release. this way
if someone has to support jdk 7, we can at least say, upgrade to this version
of lucene rather than "won't fix". No matter how much we scream, users will be
confused because it seems these bugs only affect loops of a very specific form.
On the other hand if it makes our code messy or confusing or slows things down,
we should not do this.
I will look into this new negative vint bug, it might only affect pulsing, and
see if i can make a test case+workaround for it.
> jrebug causes porter stemmer to sigsegv
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-3335
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3335
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Labels: Java7
> Attachments: LUCENE-3335.patch, LUCENE-3335_slow.patch,
> patch-0uwe.patch
>
>
> happens easily on java7: ant test -Dtestcase=TestPorterStemFilter
> -Dtests.iter=100
> might happen on 1.6.0_u26 too, a user reported something that looks like the
> same bug already:
> http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/3beaa082c4d2fdd4/porterstemfilter_kills_jvm
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
